Wednesday, June 19, 2013

The Differences between a Januvia Class Action Lawsuit and a Januvia MDL

The FDA approved Januvia—a new class of sitagliptin drugs used in the treatment of Type 2 diabetes—in 2006. Only a few short years later the FDA had accumulated 88 reports of pancreatitis from those taking Januvia. Of those patients, three-fourths of them ended up in the hospital due to the severity of the pancreatitis. When Januvia was discontinued, over half saw an immediate improvement in their pancreatitis symptoms. Nearly a fourth of these patients developed pancreatitis less than a month after beginning Januvia.

Other studies have shown that Januvia may significantly increase the risk of pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer and thyroid cancer among users. A UCLA study put the numbers at six times the risk of developing pancreatitis and 2.9 times the risk of developing pancreatic cancer for Januvia users. Because of the number of Januvia patients who developed serious health issues after beginning the drug, Januvia lawsuits are increasing steadily.

Januvia lawyers are reaching out to those who have been harmed by Januvia which affects the GLP-1 metabolic pathway while keeping Type 2 diabetes under control. The active ingredient, sitaglipin, works by interfering with the GLP-1 metabolic pathway in the pancreatic duct. This interference may disrupt the cells in the pancreas which leads to pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. One consolidated proceeding which involves multiple pancreatic cancer lawsuits is currently pending in the Los Angeles state court. Since millions of prescriptions have been written for Januvia, it is unknown just how many people will be adversely affected and how many Januvia lawsuits will be filed.

Some Januvia cases were filed in state court prior to being moved to federal court. Litigation can be managed much more efficiently when combined as resources can be shared. Depending on the number of Januvia lawsuits ultimately filed, a federal judicial panel could choose to centralize all Januvia cases under MDL procedures. Even if MDLs are formed, plaintiffs may choose to keep their Januvia lawsuits in state courts although it is expected that New Jersey will emerge as one of the more popular MDL venues as Merck & Co.’s headquarters are there. Another motion to consolidate more Januvia cases in the Southern District of California under a federal MDL is pending.

Although a fair number of lawsuits have been filed against Merck for the injuries sustained by patients taking Januvia, none have yet gone to trial. The first Januvia trial will be closely watched as it could set the tone for future Januvia lawsuit outcomes. A bellwether trial is scheduled for the summer however in light of the pending MDL’s it could be postponed. While no Januvia class action lawsuits are currently in the works, they may be organized down the road as more Januvia lawsuits are filed.


Januvia Class action lawsuits may not be a good option for patients who have been more severely injured since any settlement will be split evenly between all plaintiffs. MDLs or mass torts could be a better choice for those with serious Januvia damages in order to be fully compensated for medical expenses, pain and suffering and lost wages. Those who feel they may be entitled to compensation from Merck & Co for Januvia damages should consider contacting an experienced Januvia pancreatic cancer attorney.



Sullo & Sullo, LLP prides itself on being a client-focused law firm. With a reputation for exceptional personal attention, unmatched professionalism, zealous advocacy, and a commitment to the utilization of innovative and interactive technologies, our firm has been able to serve over 160,000 clients for more than a decade.  We wish you the best in your pursuits and encourage you to engage our firm for legal representation. For more information, visit Sullolaw - Januvia lawsuits
 

No comments:

Post a Comment